Most organizations don’t miss goals because they lack ambition. They miss because the “strategy-to-execution” chain breaks somewhere between the boardroom and the team.
And one of the most common disconnects is when HR isn’t positioned (or empowered) to translate business goals into clear, realistic employee goals—and into credible career paths that keep people committed long enough to deliver the results.
The hidden cost of “HR as support” instead of “HR as strategy”
When HR is treated as a downstream function—brought in after decisions are made—three things tend to happen:
- Company goals stay abstract. Leaders announce outcomes (“grow revenue 20%,” “reduce churn,” “improve margin”) without converting them into operational behaviors, capability shifts, and talent implications.
- Managers improvise goal-setting. Many managers were promoted for individual performance, not for their ability to translate strategy into measurable team outcomes.
- Employees experience review season as anxiety, not alignment. Performance conversations become a verdict instead of a roadmap—often pushing good people toward disengagement or the job market.
That’s not theoretical. Globally, employee engagement fell to 21% in 2024, and Gallup estimates the drop cost $438 billion in lost productivity. (Inclusion Geeks)
Even more telling: Gallup has long found that managers account for about 70% of the variance in team engagement—meaning the quality of goal-setting, feedback, coaching, and clarity from managers isn’t a “soft” factor; it’s a primary driver of whether strategy turns into execution. (Elements)
So if your organization’s strategy depends on managers… and managers depend on clarity, tools, and coaching… HR has to be at the table where goals are set.
Why goal translation breaks (and why HR is uniquely positioned to fix it)
In the post-pandemic workplace, “role clarity” has taken a hit. Gallup reporting highlighted that only about 50% of U.S. employees strongly agree they know what’s expected of them at work, down from 56% in early 2020. (AP News)
When people don’t know what “good” looks like, they don’t execute confidently—and performance management becomes reactive.
HR is positioned to prevent this because HR sits at the intersection of:
-
- business priorities (what we’re trying to achieve)
- workforce realities (what people can sustainably deliver)
- capability building (what must be learned)
- and career architecture (why someone should stay and grow here)
But HR can only connect those dots if HR is present early, not after a strategy is already “final.”
The performance review problem is often a goal-setting problem
Performance reviews get a bad reputation because they often surface misalignment that’s been building all year.
And the stakes are real. In a Reflektive survey, 85% of American professionals said they would at least consider leaving after an unfair performance review. (Reflektive)
That’s why review season can create a predictable “flight risk bump”—especially when:
-
- goals weren’t clear
- managers weren’t trained to set measurable outcomes
- employees didn’t see a development path (only a rating)
It’s also why many leaders are increasingly uneasy about the traditional model. Gallup’s data consistently points back to the manager capability gap: only 44% of managers globally report receiving management training. (Business Insider)
If managers aren’t trained, goal-setting becomes guesswork. And guesswork becomes disengagement.
“Open to Work” is a signal—not just a badge
If engagement is the invisible metric, LinkedIn is often where the visible signals show up.
CNBC reporting has noted that about 220 million people are using LinkedIn’s “Open to Work” feature. (NBC New York)
That number doesn’t mean all 220 million are unhappy. But it does reflect a reality leaders should take seriously:
When performance and career conversations feel unclear or unfair, employees don’t always argue. They update their profiles.
In other words: your performance management system and your internal mobility/career pathing system are retention tools—or they’re attrition accelerators.
What “HR with a seat at the table” actually does differently
Having a seat at the table isn’t symbolic. It’s operational.
When HR is truly strategic, HR helps leaders do five things that directly impact results:
1) Translate business outcomes
Every business goal implies capabilities:
- “Improve customer retention” implies account management discipline, customer success playbooks, product education, and cross-functional response times.
- “Increase margin” implies process improvement, pricing hygiene, negotiation skills, and manager accountability.
HR can structure goal conversations so leaders answer.
2) Build a cascading goal system that doesn’t collapse in the middle
A practical cascade looks like this:
Company Goal → Team Contribution → Role Outcomes → Individual SMART goals + behaviors
Where most companies fail is the “middle”:
- Teams don’t know what contribution matters most.
- Managers set goals that are either too vague (“be more strategic”) or too KPI-driven (“do 30 tickets/week”) without linking to outcomes.
HR can facilitate a simple but powerful translation framework:
- Outcome: What changes if we succeed?
- Metric: How will we measure it?
- Ownership: Who drives it?
- Operating rhythm: How often will we check progress?
- Support: What training/resources are required?
3) Upskill managers in goal-setting (because most were never taught)
Given only 44% of managers report receiving training, many are operating on instinct. (Business Insider)
HR can close this gap quickly with a “Manager Goal-Setting Kit”:
- examples of strong goals by role type
- SMART + milestones templates
- calibration guides (so goals aren’t wildly uneven across teams)
- coaching prompts for quarterly check-ins
4) Shift performance reviews from “annual judgment” to “ongoing clarity”
Gallup’s engagement research repeatedly ties performance outcomes to engagement and managerial effectiveness. (media-01.imu.nl)
The practical takeaway isn’t “do more surveys.” It’s:
- set expectations early
- check progress often
- and course-correct without drama
That’s how you prevent review season from becoming resignation season.
Why the beginning of the year matters (and what to do now)
January is when most organizations set goals—and when they accidentally bake misalignment into the entire year. If you need help translating your organization’s values into clear, actionable goals for your people, Turning the Corner can help.
The real point: HR isn’t “people support.” HR is execution infrastructure.
If managers drive engagement (and they do), and engagement drives outcomes (it does), then HR’s job isn’t to “support the business.”
HR’s job is to build the management system that makes strategy executable—through clear expectations, aligned goals, trained managers, and career pathways that keep talent in the building.
Or said another way:
If your company goals aren’t translating into employee goals, HR doesn’t need better forms. HR needs a seat at the table—early—where the goals are born.